Body dissatisfaction. In order to measure body dissatisfaction (difference between actual and ideal figure) and internalization of the ideal thin figure (defined as the selection of a thin silhouette from a group of silhouettes of various body sizes), a set of 10 silhouettes assumed to be neutral to ethnicity, culture, and details (Figure 1) was used. A German work group (Jaeger, Massoubre & Lamprecht, 2000) originally developed these for a previous multi-cross-cultural study in a three-stdecades peer revision procedure. Four questions were asked in relation to the silhouette scales: “Please mark with a cross the silhouette that best represents the current shape of your body”; “What do you wish you looked like?”; “What is the most attractive silhouette in your opinion?”; “What do you find the most attractive silhouette in the opposite sex?” Participants were asked to mark with a cross the position representing their attitudes on a 0-10 decimal scale (Figure 1); positions between the two silhouettes were allowed and coded as real numbers. tt= 0.82 (“actual”); Rtt= 0.77 (“ideal”); Rtt= 0.71 (“attractive”); and those of convergent validity as: Rcit= 0.73 (“actual” and BMI). The procedures followed by the authors, as well as the psychometric features, are described in detail elsewhere (Jaeger et al., 2002; Jaeger et al., 2000).
Diet discipline was counted because of the Diet Level of one’s Food Perceptions Try (EAT) (Gather, Olmsted, Bohr & Garfinkel, 1982), composed of 16 statements scored on a beneficial six-point measure (never ever = 0/always = 5), having highest scores exhibiting a higher level out-of controlled dining. For the Eat psychometrical characteristics discover Garner mais aussi al. (1982). The texture coefficient for trials, the latest North american country and you can German of them examine este enlace ahora mismo, are of the same worth, a leader from 0.76.
Fat loss discipline
Ineffectiveness size. The new bad connect with basis is actually projected from Ineffectiveness Level from this new Dinner Conditions List (EDI) (Gather et al., 1983), that has shown an effective convergent legitimacy (ineffectiveness/self-esteem ) from Roentgen = 0.70 (p
Medical team grabbed the extra weight and you may peak strategies
Body mass index (BMI). Bmi are computed while the lbs for the kilograms separated because of the peak for the square yards (Body mass index = kg/m2).
Before data range, a good airplane pilot study of the fresh Silhouettes Level (Contour step 1), put on an example composed of 20 Mexican students, was applied to check on this new appropriateness of your own numbers so you can portray human anatomy sizes, in order to validate a acceptation out-of an as yet not known number of silhouettes and you will a clear knowledge of brand new rules (the brand new Italian language group currently mentioned which have data within this esteem). The outcomes presented the new Silhouette Level try a good otherwise a keen suitable appliance for the North american country take to.
The fresh investigators of the two countries, at the Mexico Area as well as Hae (standardized) procedure. The new forms have been used on sets of scientific and breastfeeding children in the North american country and you may Italian language colleges. A primary reason behind the new ples away from pupils linked to treatments was only the focus you to definitely (you can assume) these young adults have to have toward medical industry as well as for health issues, making them alot more tuned in to dilemmas instance ED. Advised agree was extracted from all of the study members. The called students agreed to take part. The new respective regional integrity committees approved the brand new low-intrusive processes. Top-notch translators undertook and you will controlled the fresh new translation and retranslation of tool.
Age. The mean age of Mexican women (Mage = 20.4, SD = 0.49) and German women (Mage = 20.8, SD = 1.0) differed statistically: t(346)= 4.29, p = 0.000. It is important to note that we expected not to find a significant difference in this variable, but a minimal difference of a few tenths (0.4) resulted in a significant one, most likely due to the large size of the total sample, since in separate structural analysis, age accounted for